About Land and its Value in Romania – part III
As I said in the previous episodes, the values of the lands for development in Romania reached unsustainable levels, if we consider the real situation, at this moment of crisis. I shall mention that this level is not recorded in the case of the lands with an exclusive agricultural purpose, and this is due to the problems related to the crumbling, especially the lack of efficient financing and a fee corresponding to the quality of the soil. The only exception with significant increases is in Dobrudja for lands with perspective of wind energy development.
In connection with the assessment of the lands, I would make a few references from the point of view of a professional assessor who followed the evolution in the assessing of the value for these assets. This activity was treated in many cases superficially by the real estate assessor, although it is a very complex and sensitive domain of assessment.
At the beginning of the decade, the assessment used an empirical method, used by the Body of the Technical experts, which was a false statistical method of recurrence, which is still used, unfortunately, by certain assessors today, generating many controversies. After the apparition of the international standards of assessment in 2003, promoted by ANEVAR and recognized by most of the institutions, the assessors had adequate instruments at their disposal (6 methods) of approach, however, aspects that had a negative influence on the correct assessing of the value appeared.
I shall mention three of the most important aspects. One of the most frequent errors of the financer and the assessor is that they accepted mortgages and assessments of the lands under development, without a complete legal description, cadastral documentation, or certificate of urbanism or the project with the license of construction, although in most of the cases they noted these lacks as limitative conditions.
The use of the market comparison method without considering the development lands, considering that the market was in expansion, and without considering the information indicated above, they lead in the late cases to overestimations. In many cases, these overestimations were annihilated by the spectacular evolution of the market.
The use of the residual method, without well documented projects and without considering the risks of the real estate investments, the compliance with the execution term, estimated construction costs, as well as the time interval needed to sell or rent the finalized project, generated an overestimation.
In the period of expansion of the market, the cheap money, when anything was bought for the prices of tomorrow on the real estate market, the vigilance of the risk departments of the bank was low and influenced by the increase in the recent years of the prices on the real estate market by two-figure percents. Although the NBR warned many times, in time, by its spokesman, about the heating of the market, or the „real estate bubble”, it has not enough instruments to stop these behaviors, and the financers who did not avoid such traps could have some surprises.
Dr. ec. Adrian Crivii, MAA, FRICS